Appeal No. 2001-0271 Page 9 Application No. 08/855,474 the art at the time of appellant's invention even without the additional teachings of Zielinski. Accordingly, we shall sustain the examiner's rejection of representative claim 12, as well as claims 1-9, 13 and 14 which fall therewith, under 35 U.S.C. § 103. As appellant has not separately argued the patentability of claims 10 and 11 apart from claims 1-9 and 12-14, we shall sustain the examiner's rejection of these claims as being unpatentable over House in view of Zielinski and Murphy as well. Turning next to the examiner's rejection of claim 15 as being unpatentable over Spector, we note that Spector discloses an album for a compact disc constituted by a rectangular cover panel 15 which is hinged to a rectangular cover panel 16. These panels may be formed from a single blank of cardboard or other flexible material, which is transversely scored to form parallel fold lines 17 creating a hinge which forms the spine of the album. Laminated to the inner surface of the rear cover panel 16 is a face panel 18 of the same dimensions as the rear cover panel and formed of the same or similar material. The thickness of the face panel 18Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007