Appeal No. 2001-0305 Page 6 Application No. 09/077,356 the field of the inventor's endeavor and, if not, whether it is reasonably pertinent to the problem with which the inventor was involved. In re Wood, 599 F.2d 1032, 1036, 202 USPQ 171, 174 (CCPA 1979). A reference is reasonably pertinent if, even though it may be in a different field of endeavor, it logically would have commended itself to an inventor's attention in considering his problem because of the matter with which it deals. In re Clay, 966 F.2d 656, 659, 23 USPQ2d 1058, 1061 (Fed. Cir. 1992). As explained on page 2 of appellant's specification, one of the problems with which appellant was involved was providing a simple and secure connection of the valve closing element and the connecting part, such that the possibility of detachment during the axial movement of the valve needle is completely ruled out. Likewise, the Soviet patent is directed to a non-detachable coupling of male and female parts which is simple to manufacture (translation, p. 4) and, thus, would have commended itself to an artisan faced with the problem addressed by appellant. Thus, we conclude that the Soviet patent is analogous art in the context of appellant's invention.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007