Ex Parte CURRIE - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2001-0308                                       Page 2           
          Application No. 09/188,701                                                  

                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               The appellant's invention relates to a Robertson driver for            
          driving a screw (claims 1-3 and 5-9) and a method for                       
          manipulating a wire by use of a Robertson driver (claim 4).  In             
          particular, appellant’s invention is the placement of a slot in             
          the end of the tip of a Robertson driver, enabling a user to                
          manipulate a wire (specification, page 5).  A copy of the claims            
          under appeal is set forth in the appendix to the appellant's                
          brief.                                                                      
               The examiner relied upon the following prior art references            
          of record in rejecting the appealed claims:                                 
          Sloan                    173,356             Feb.  8, 1876                  
          Foshee                   2,195,773           Apr.  2, 1940                  
          Wingert                  4,257,159           Mar. 24, 1981                  
          Frazier                  4,485,852           Dec.  4, 1984                  
          Wilner                   5,353,667           Oct. 11, 1994                  
               Additionally, this panel of the Board relied upon the                  
          following prior art in entering a new ground of rejection:                  
          The admitted prior art in appellant’s specification on page 5,              
          lines 12-18 (AAPA).                                                         
               The following rejections are before us for review.                     
          (1)  Claim 9 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second                  
          paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point            






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007