Ex parte GOLDEN et al. - Page 4




          Appeal No. 2001-0337                                       Page 4           
          Application No. 29/091,083                                                  


          of a drawing view from a different point of view.                           
          Specifically, the examiner states (answer, p. 4) that                       
               [i]n the absence of a disclosure of the specific                       
               contours, configuration, and spatial and planar                        
               relationship and configuration of the disclosed elements               
               of the claimed design, the claimed design is subject to                
               conjecture and could be achieved by different                          
               configurations.                                                        


               The appellants state (brief, p. 4) that the design sought              
          to be patented is the ornamentality provided by a rocker box                
          when viewed from the side, and is not limited to the specific               
          three-dimensional geometry of their commercial design.  The                 
          appellants argue (brief, pp. 5-6) that one skilled in the art               
          could make and use the design illustrated in the drawings.  We              
          agree.  In that regard, the ornamental design for a side                    
          portion of a motorcycle rocker box as shown and described in                
          the appellants' application constitutes a complete disclosure               
          of the side portion of a motorcycle rocker box in all                       
          essential respects, is so far as its appearance in side view                
          is concerned.  Any side portion of a motorcycle rocker box                  
          having substantially the appearance depicted in the                         
          appellants' drawings would constitute an infringement of any                








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007