Appeal No. 2001-0342 Page 6 Application No. 08/677,707 original description must come to comply with the description requirement of section 112 must be determined on a case-by-case basis." Eiselstein v. Frank, 52 F.3d 1035, 1039, 34 USPQ2d 1467, 1470 (Fed. Cir. 1995) (quoting Vas-Cath, 935 F.2d at 1561, 19 USPQ2d at 1116). It is our determination that the originally filed disclosure does not provide written description support for the subject matter of claims 11 and 14 to 20. The originally filed application (p. 9, lines 7-10) states that [p]lunger 10 may include a one-way flap valve or the like (not shown) in handle 14 to provide easy escape of air from bellows 20 during compression of bellows 20 or can depend on the special configuration of rim 30 for such air escape. From this disclosure and the appellant's use of the word "or" in the above-quoted sentence, it is our determination that persons of ordinary skill in the art would recognize the originally filed application as disclosing two separate and distinct embodiments of the drain plunger 10. The first embodiment is where the drain plunger 10 includes a one-way flap valve or the like in handle 14 to provide easy escape ofPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007