Ex parte CARY - Page 5




                 Appeal No. 2001-0401                                                                                     Page 5                        
                 Application No. 09/019,451                                                                                                             


                 respective positions articulated by the appellant and the                                                                              
                 examiner.  As a consequence of our review, we make the                                                                                 
                 determinations which follow.                                                                                                           


                          When it is necessary to select elements of various                                                                            
                 teachings in order to form the claimed invention, we ascertain                                                                         
                 whether there is any suggestion or motivation in the prior art                                                                         
                 to make the selection made by the appellant.  Obviousness                                                                              
                 cannot be established by combining the teachings of the prior                                                                          
                 art to produce the claimed invention, absent some teaching,                                                                            
                 suggestion or incentive supporting the combination.  The                                                                               
                 extent to which such suggestion must be explicit in, or may be                                                                         
                 fairly inferred from, the references, is decided on the facts                                                                          
                 of each case, in light of the prior art and its relationship                                                                           
                 to the appellant's invention.  It is impermissible, however,                                                                           
                 simply to engage in a hindsight reconstruction of the claimed                                                                          
                 invention, using the appellant's structure as a template and                                                                           
                 selecting elements from references to fill the gaps.  The                                                                              


                          3(...continued)                                                                                                               
                 single bracket 142 mounted to the first storage compartment                                                                            
                 60).                                                                                                                                   







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007