Ex parte KURZ et al. - Page 1




                           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written              
                                  for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                       

                                                                                        Paper No. 19               

                             UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                             
                                                 ____________                                                      
                                 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                
                                             AND INTERFERENCES                                                     
                                                 ____________                                                      
               Ex parte THEKLA KURZ, SABINE HITZEL, ROLAND MARTIN and RALF EMMERT                                  
                                                 ____________                                                      
                                              Appeal No. 2001-0441                                                 
                                           Application No. 08/779,219                                              
                                                 ____________                                                      
                                                    ON BRIEF                                                       
                                                 ____________                                                      
             Before WILLIAM F. SMITH, ELLIS and ROBINSON, Administrative Patent Judges.                            
             ELLIS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                   


                                             DECISION ON APPEAL                                                    
                    This is an appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134 of the examiner’s final rejection of             
             claims 1-2 and 7-17.  Claims 3-6 are also pending; however, the examiner has only                     
             objected to these claims as being dependent on a rejected base claim.  Answer, p. 2.                  
             According to the examiner, these claims would be allowable if re-written in an independent            
             form which includes all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims.  Id.         
             Claims 18-27 have been canceled.                                                                      


                                                        1                                                          





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007