Ex parte CREGO et al. - Page 6




         Appeal No. 2001-0464                                      Page 6          
         Application No. 08/888,967                                                


         footrest from the forward support bar of the ski lift chair,              
         Piper does not teach or suggest coupling a clasp of a                     
         snowboard support and tether to a restraint bar of a                      
         chairlift.                                                                


              In our view, the only suggestion for modifying Westwood              
         in the manner proposed by the examiner to meet the above-noted            
         limitations stems from hindsight knowledge derived from the               
         appellants' own disclosure.  The use of such hindsight                    
         knowledge to support an obviousness rejection under 35 U.S.C.             
         § 103 is, of course, impermissible.  See, for example, W. L.              
         Gore and Assocs., Inc. v. Garlock, Inc., 721 F.2d 1540, 1553,             
         220 USPQ 303, 312-13 (Fed. Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S.             
         851 (1984).  It follows that we cannot sustain the examiner's             
         rejections of claims 6 to 10.                                             


                                    CONCLUSION                                     














Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007