Ex parte OSTERBERG et al. - Page 10




          Appeal No. 2001-0472                                      Page 10           
          Application No. 09/153,951                                                  


          appellants' own disclosure.  The use of such hindsight                      
          knowledge to support an obviousness rejection under 35 U.S.C.               
          § 103 is, of course, impermissible.  See, for example, W. L.                
          Gore and Assocs., Inc. v. Garlock, Inc., 721 F.2d 1540, 1553,               
          220 USPQ 303, 312-13 (Fed. Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S.               
          851 (1984).                                                                 


               For the reasons set forth above, the decision of the                   
          examiner to reject claims 19 to 24 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is                 
          reversed.                                                                   


                                     CONCLUSION                                       
               To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject                   
          claim 22 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, is affirmed                
          and the                                                                     

















Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007