Ex parte SCHREIBER - Page 1



                       The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                                                       
                                   for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                           

                                                                                                                    Paper No. 19                        

                                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                      
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                       
                                                              AND INTERFERENCES                                                                         
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                                                   Ex parte STEPHEN B. SCHREIBER                                                                        
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                                                           Appeal No. 2001-0483                                                                         
                                                      Application No. 08/996,8421                                                                       
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                                                                      ON BRIEF                                                                          
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                 Before ABRAMS, McQUADE, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                        
                 NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                     



                                                             DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                         
                          This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                                                                        
                 rejection of claims 1, 2, 12 to 15 and 21 to 24.   Claims 3 to                        2                                                
                 11 and 16 to 20 have been allowed.  No claim has been                                                                                  
                 canceled.                                                                                                                              

                          1According to the appellant, the application is a                                                                             
                 continuation-in-part of Application No. 08/187,111, which                                                                              
                 application was the subject of Board of Patent Appeals and                                                                             
                 Interferences decisions dated May 29, 1996 and September 27,                                                                           
                 1996 and a Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit decision                                                                           
                 dated October 23, 1997.                                                                                                                
                          2Claims 14 to 20 were amended subsequent to the final                                                                         
                 rejection.                                                                                                                             




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007