Ex parte ABRAHAMSON - Page 4




          Appeal No. 2001-0549                                                        
          Application No. 08/761,422                                                  


          strap or band 20 may be threaded through openings 12 in the                 
          flange and passed around the patient’s ears or around the entire            
          head to keep the holding assembly in place.                                 





               Among the claim limitations argued by appellant as                     
          distinguishing over Gereg is the requirement found in each of               
          the independent claims on appeal that the elongated catheter                
          comprises an elongated tubular catheter body portion having                 
          distal and proximal end portions, and a hub member attached to              
          the body portion at the proximal end portion thereof.  In                   
          rejecting the appealed claims as being anticipated by Gereg, the            
          examiner reads the claimed elongated tubular catheter on Gereg’s            
          endotracheal tube 14, and the claimed hub member on Gereg’s bite            
          block 19.  Appellant argues (brief, page 5) that the bit block              
          of Gereg is not attached to the proximal end portion of the                 
          endotracheal tube, but rather is attached to the tube 14 at a               
          point that is intermediate or between the ends thereof.  In                 
          response, the examiner takes the position (answer, pages 3-4)               
          that “in Gereg, the ‘body portion’ [of the tube] can be                     







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007