Appeal No. 2001-0558 Application No. 08/966,708 prior art does not respond to the limitations in independent claim 32 relating to the bonding strip. Witty discloses a self-contained reagent package and calibration assembly comprising a plurality of reagent package devices 10 and a reagent standards device 50. Each reagent package device includes a plurality of wells with open top ends and a removable protective cover 21 sealed to the top of the package to close the open top ends of all but one of the wells. The reagent standards device includes a plurality of receptacles having open top ends and a removable protective cover 60 substantially similar to the removable cover 21 for closing these open top ends. In proposing to combine the admitted prior art and Witty to reject claim 32, the examiner submits that Witty et al suggest providing a strip of bonding material 60 over a plurality of test tubes 68 to seal the respective openings to protect the test cells from contamination and provide a surface for labeling information. Therefore, it would have been obvious in view of Witty et al to provide a strip of protective material to cover the openings of the cuvettes of the Admitted Prior Art and to assemble them into one package for shipping. One of ordinary skill in the . . . art would readily understand the width of the strip can be decreased as long as the strip covers the openings of the cuvettes and would have found it obvious to alter the width of the strip to anything less than the width of the 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007