Appeal No. 2001-0783
Application 09/012,796
Notwithstanding this argument, it is our view that the claim
language has been given the broadest reasonable interpretation
by the examiner. Accordingly, we agree that Kuroi anticipates
this broadly worded claim.
In summary, we affirm the examiner’s rejections of
claims 1-9.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
con- nection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR §
1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
WILLIAM F. PATE, III )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF
PATENT
LAWRENCE J. STAAB ) APPEALS
AND
Administrative Patent Judge )
INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
JEFFREY V. NASE )
Administrative Patent Judge )
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007