Ex parte FISCHER - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2001-0844                                       Page 2           
          Application No. 08/736,330                                                  


               The appellant's invention relates to a braking control                 
          system for a motor vehicle (claim 1) and a method of                        
          controlling brake operation of a motor vehicle (claim 5).  A                
          copy of the claims under appeal is set forth in the appendix                
          to the appellant's brief.                                                   


               Claims 1 and 5 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as              
          being anticipated by U.S. Patent No. 5,632,535 to Luckevich et              
          al. (Luckevich).                                                            


               Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced              
          by the examiner and the appellant regarding the above-noted                 
          rejection, we make reference to the final rejection (Paper No.              
          11, mailed July 19, 1999) and the answer (Paper No. 17, mailed              
          August 11, 2000) for the examiner's complete reasoning in                   
          support of the rejection, and to the brief (Paper No. 16,                   
          filed May 2, 2000) for the appellant's arguments thereagainst.              


                                       OPINION                                        
               In reaching our decision in this appeal, we have given                 
          careful consideration to the appellant's specification and                  







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007