The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 34 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte TERRY B. STROM, XIN XIAO ZHENG and ALAN STEELE __________ Appeal No. 2001-08931 Application No. 08/968,905 __________ ON BRIEF2 __________ Before WILLIAM F. SMITH, SCHEINER and ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judges. ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 16, 18 and 34-37, which are all the claims pending in the application. 1 We note that this appeal is related to Appeal No. 2000-0839 (Application No. 08/355,502) accordingly these two appeals were considered together. 2 In accordance with 37 CFR 1.194(c), the Board decided that an oral hearing was not necessary in this appeal. Therefore, appellants’ request for oral hearing is moot.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007