The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 32
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte THOMAS M. BEGGINS
____________
Appeal No. 2001-1284
Application No. 08/792,765
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before NASE, CRAWFORD, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Claims 1 to 29 are pending and were rejected in the final
rejection (Paper No. 24, mailed March 24, 2000).1 No claim has
been canceled. The appellant has limited the appeal to claims 1
to 23, 28 and 29 (brief, p. 1). Accordingly, the appeal as to
claims 24 to 27 is dismissed.
We AFFIRM-IN-PART.
1 Claim 1 was amended subsequent to the final rejection.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007