Appeal No. 2001-1328 Application 09/079,537 been used as a template to selectively combine isolated disclosures in the prior art without any legitimate suggestion or motivation to do so. Accordingly, we shall not sustain the standing 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) rejection of independent claims 1 and 7, and dependent claims 3 through 5 as being unpatentable over Laurash in view of Neubauer, or the standing 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) rejection of dependent claims 2 and 6 as being unpatentable over Laurash in view of Neubauer and Doll. SUMMARY The decision of the examiner to reject claims 1 through 7 is reversed. REVERSED 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007