Appeal No. 2001-1360
Application 09/290,056
Claims 1, 8, 9 and 15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) as being unpatentable over Itzel in view of Groess and
Junkel.
Claims 2 through 4, 6 and 7 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) as being unpatentable over Itzel in view of Groess,
Junkel and Lurkis.
Claim 5 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Itzel in view of Groess, Junkel and Baeuerle.
Claims 10 through 12 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §
103(a) as being unpatentable over Itzel in view of Groess,
Junkel and Saaski.
Claim 16 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Itzel in view of Groess, Junkel and Cunning.
Claims 17 and 20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)
as being unpatentable over Itzel in view of Groess, Junkel and
Siegel.
Claim 18 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Itzel in view of Groess, Junkel and Julinot.
Claim 19 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Itzel in view of Groess, Junkel and Chu.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007