Appeal No. 2001-1385 Page 6
Application No. 09/275,132
of David as disclosing a method for prototyping parts is
unreasonable.
The examiner relies upon the teachings of Mohan for a
suggestion to form the apertures 50 or perforations 51 of
David’s carrier by laser cutting. However, such modification
of David would still not arrive at the claimed invention, for
the reasons discussed above, and we perceive in Mohan no
teaching or suggestion which would cure the deficiency in
David.
CONCLUSION
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007