Appeal No. 2001-1387
Application No. 08/715,210
b) the standing 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) rejection of dependent
claims 9 through 12 and 15 as being unpatentable over Unipac
in view of Helms and Finkelstein; or
c) the standing 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) rejection of
independent claims 1 and 17, and dependent claims 2 through 8,
13, 16 and 19, as being unpatentable over Peeters in view of
Helms.
SUMMARY
The decision of the examiner to reject claims 1 through
19 is reversed.
REVERSED
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007