Appeal No. 2001-1402 Application 09/287,838 We also consider the “means for releasably securing” recited in claim 1, construed in accordance with 35 U.S.C. § 112, sixth paragraph, to be met by Meier. In the elected species of appellant’s invention, Figs. 27 and 28, the structure which corresponds to this means is slots 479 in base member 470, which slots may be provided to accommodate shoelaces for attaching the device to a shoe (page 21, lines 21 to 26). Since Meier discloses the same structure, namely, holes 16 in bottom member 3 to receive shoelaces (col. 2, lines 42 to 47), it meets the claimed means. Claim 5 recites: 5. The accessory of claim 1, wherein the means supports the figurine in an upright stance on the shoe. Since Meier’s clown’s head 2 is “upright,” i.e., is essentially vertical on the shoe as shown in Fig. 1, this claim’s limitations are met. Claim 6 recites: 6. The accessory of claim 1, wherein the means includes an elongate strip extending lengthwise beneath the closure on the shoe. Appellant asserts that Meier’s bottom portion 3 is not “an 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007