Ex parte SCHNEID - Page 3




              Appeal No. 2001-1405                                                                                        
              Application No. 09/207,766                                                                                  


                     Tillenburg discloses a method for producing a brake pad for a disc brake which will                  
              dampen or absorb vibration.  The carrier plate 1 is made of two metal parts 2, 3 which                      
              have a resilient bonding and dampening material 4 interposed between them, the friction                     
              lining 5 of the brake pad being attached to part 3.  The bonding material 4 between parts 2                 
              and 3 is “slightly compressible, vibration-damping, heat-insulating, elastic and non-                       
              swellable” (col. 4, lines 18 and 19), and may be cyclized rubber (col. 4, lines 34 and 35) or               
              other rubber related materials (col. 5, lines 9 to 17).                                                     
                     The examiner takes the position that (answer, page 5):                                               
                     It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, at the time of the                   
                     invention, to have provided the invention of [AAPA-1] with the steps of                              
                     placing an elastic bonding material between contact surfaces of the at least                         
                     one base and the at least one fibrous material processing element and                                
                     elastically bonding the at least one base and the at least one fibrous material                      
                     processing element, in light of the teachings of Tillenburg, in order to reduce                      
                     vibration between the fibrous material processing element and the base.                              
                     Appellant argues on pages 7 to 9 of the reply brief that Tillenburg constitutes                      
              nonanalogous art.  However, under the view we take of this case, it is unnecessary to                       
              decide this issue, and we will assume for the purpose of argument that it is analogous art.                 
                     While we appreciate the examiner’s position, we do not consider the rejection of                     
              claim 1 to be well taken.  The examiner contends that if one of ordinary skill were                         


              faced with the problem of reducing vibration between a base and a fibrous material                          


                                                            3                                                             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007