Ex parte GUERET - Page 1




          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of                 
          the Board.                                                                  
                                                          Paper No. 30                
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                     __________                                       
                            Ex parte JEAN-LOUIS H. GUERET                             
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 2001-1466                                  
                               Application 09/055,899                                 
                                     ___________                                      
                               HEARD: October 23, 2001                                
                                     ___________                                      
          Before FRANKFORT, STAAB, and MCQUADE, Administrative Patent                 
          Judges.                                                                     
          MCQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                       

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               Jean-Louis H. Gueret originally took this appeal from the              
          decision of the examiner (Paper No. 20) to reject claims 1                  
          through 3, 5 through 17, 25, 26, 33 and 37 through 43.  The                 
          examiner has since withdrawn the rejections of claims 42 and                
          43, which now stand allowed.  Hence, the appeal as to these                 
          two claims is hereby dismissed, leaving for review the                      
          standing rejections of claims 1 through 3, 5 through 17, 25,                



                                          1                                           




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007