Appeal No. 1999-2313
Application No. 08/396,288
Thus, the claimed invention is not taught or
suggested by Hidaka or Iwazumi. Therefore, we do not
sustain the examiner’s rejection of claims 45, 46 and 50.
Since Asahi does not overcome the deficiencies of Hidaka
or Iwazumi, we also do not sustain the examiner’s
rejection of claims 47-49 and 51-58. Accordingly, the
decision of the examiner rejecting claims 45-58 is
reversed.
REVERSED
KENNETH W. HAIRSTON )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
ERROL A. KRASS ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
JERRY SMITH )
Administrative Patent Judge )
JS:hh
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007