Appeal No. 2001-1768 Page 6
Application No. 09/285,787
Dependent claims 5, 6, 11 and 14 are rejected on the basis of the references applied
against claim 1 et al. taken further in view of Pichowicz, which is cited for its teaching of
providing a decorative cover over a wall cabinet member. Be that as it may, this additional
reference does not cure the problems pointed out above with regard to the rejection of
claim 1. This being the case, we also will not sustain the rejection of claims 5, 6, 11 and
14.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007