Appeal No. 2001-2057
Application 09/155,574
Claims 1, 2, and 9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §
102(b) as being anticipated by Fuchs.
Claims 3 and 7 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over Fuchs in view of Weston.
Claim 4 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Fuchs in view of Solignac.
Claims 5 and 8 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over Fuchs.
The full text of the examiner’s rejections and response
to the argument presented by appellants appears in the final
rejection and the answer (Paper Nos. 8 and 11), while the
complete statement of appellants’ argument can be found in the
main and reply briefs (Paper Nos. 10 and 12 ).
In the main brief (page 4), appellants indicate that the
rejection of claims 2 through 5 and 7 through 9 will be
decided on the basis of whether claim 1 is properly rejected
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007