Appeal No. 2001-2294 Application 29/097,935 In light of the foregoing, we will not sustain the examiner’s rejection of the design claim before us on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, based on lack of enablement. REVERSED BRADLEY R. GARRIS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT CHARLES E. FRANKFORT ) Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) ) INTERFERENCES ) PETER F. KRATZ ) Administrative Patent Judge ) CEF:pgg McGlew and Tuttle Scarborough Station Scarborough, NY 10510-0827 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007