Ex parte CLARK et al. - Page 4




              Appeal No.  2001-2308                                                                                            
              Application 07/704,578                                                                                           

              Background                                                                                                       
                      Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is a natural substance having many biological activities. Many                      
              different names have been given to the natural substance by researchers obtaining the                            
              protein from a variety of different sources: 26 KD protein, IFN-beta-2, BCDF, and BSF-2,                         
              for example (specification, page 2).  A cDNA sequence encoding IL-6 was isolated from                            
              an HTLV-transformed T cell line (specification, page 12).  The cDNA is 1.1 kb long, and                          
              contains an open reading frame of 636 nucleotides encoding a protein of 212 amino acids                          
              including a leader secretory sequence (specification, page 8). The invention at bar                              
              involves the protein sequence from amino acids 28 through 212 (specification, page 7,                            
              and Figure 1).  The disclosure includes production of glycosylated IL-6 in mammalian cell                        
              lines.  The protein produced in a mammalian cell line has an apparent molecular weight                           

              range of approximately 20 to 35 KD, indicative of glycosylation (e.g. specification, page                        
              21).  Importantly, the claims before us are limited to the nonglycosylated protein.                              
              Production of nonglycosylated IL-6 in bacterial cells is disclosed, for example, at                              
              specification pages 6, 7, 18-20.                                                                                 
                      Rather than recapitulating the arguments of appellant and examiner, we refer to                          
              pages 11-33 of the Brief for the appellant’s position, and pages 4-15 of the Examiner’s                          
              Answer for the examiner’s position.                                                                              





                                                              4                                                                





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007