Interference 103,685
The subject matter of Claims 1, 3-12, 15-19, 23, 24,
26-32, 35-40, 43, 45-49 and 52 of Holsten’s involved
application is not unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103 in
view of Kelly (HX 2)(Paper No. 83, p. 39).
Riggins’ Preliminary Motion 4 (Paper No. 22) is
dismissed (Paper No. 83, p. 40).
Riggins’ Preliminary Motion 5 (Paper No. 23) is granted
(Paper No. 83, p. 41).
The amendment proposing addition of Claims 69-71
(RX 5) to Riggins’ involved application, which amendment
accompanied Riggins’ Preliminary Motions 2 and 5 (Paper
Nos. 20 & 23), shall be entered (Paper No. 83, p. 41).
Claims 69-71 of Riggins’ involved application shall be
designated as corresponding to Count 1 (Paper No. 83,
p. 41).
Riggins’ Preliminary Motion 6 (Paper No. 24) is denied
(Paper No. 83, p. 56).
The amendment proposing addition of Claims 72-76
(RX 6) to Riggins’ involved application shall not be
entered because proposed Claims 72-76 do not satisfy the
requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 112, first and second paragraphs
(Paper No. 83, p. 56).
-18-
Page: Previous 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007