37 CFR § 1.662(a). Somerville has filed a paper entitled "SOMERVILLE, POIRIER, and DENNIS SUBMISSION PURSUANT TO ORDER DATED MARCH 22, 2001" (Paper 128). Attached to the paper is an arbitrator's decision. Somerville asks that judgment be entered against Peoples pursuant to the arbitrator's decision. Somerville states that the arbitrator's decision "confirm[s] cancellation of Peoples and Sinskey's claims 34 to 37 and 42" (Paper 128 at 1); however, the arbitrator denied Peoples preliminary motion 3 seeking to cancel claims 34 to 37 and 42 (arbitrator's decision at 54). Accordingly, claims 34 to 37 and 42 remain in the interference and correspond to Count 1 (see Paper 1 at 47). Somerville has filed a paper entitled "SOMERVILLE, POIRIER, and DENNIS SUBMISSION OF INFORMATION IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONCLUSION OF THE INTERFERENCE" (Paper 129). Neither party has shown that the information contained in the paper filed by Somerville has any bearing on the judgment entered below. 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007