2. Upon consideration of the fact that Wojciak has not timely served its evidence on the issue of priority, and has indicated that it will not serve any evidence on priority, it is ORDERED that judgment on priority as to Count 2, the sole count in the interference, is awarded against junior party Stan Wojciak. FURTHER ORDERED that junior party Stan Wojciak is not entitled to a patent containing claims 1-3 and 5-20 (corresponding to Count 2) of U.S. Patent 5,922,783, granted 13 July 1999, based on application 08/805,193, filed 27 February 1997. FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this paper shall be made of record in files of Nishiyama application 08/730,025 and U.S. Patent 5,922,783. FURTHER ORDERED that if there is a settlement agreement, attention is directed to 35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and 37 CFR § 1.661. ______________________________ FRED E. McKELVEY, Senior ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ______________________________) RICHARD E. SCHAFER ) BOARD OF PATENT Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ______________________________) SALLY C. MEDLEY ) Administrative Patent Judge ) - 5 -Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007