The opinion in support of the decision being
entered today is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper 45
Filed by: Interference Trial Section Motions Panel
Box Interference Filed:
Washington, D.C. 20231 26 September 2001
Tel: 703-308-9797
Fax: 703-305-0942
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
MARK SKOWRONSKI,
Junior Party,
(Patent 5,811,201),
v.
MICHAEL S. HSU and ETHAN D. HOAG,
Senior Party,
(Application 09/352,093).
_______________
Patent Interference No. 104,561
_______________
Before: SCHAFER, TORCZON and SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judges.
SCHAFER, Administrative Patent Judge.
JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO 37 CFR § 1.662
Skowronski has filed a request for entry of an adverse judgment under 37 CFR § 1.662(a).
Paper 44. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that judgment on priority as to the subject matter of Count 1 (Paper 1, p.5), is
awarded against the junior party, MARK SKOWRONSKI;
FURTHER ORDERED that junior party, MARK SKOWRONSKI, is not entitled to a patent
containing claims 10-13 (corresponding to Count 1) of U.S. Patent 5,811,201;
Page: 1 2 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007