THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION and is not binding precedent of the Board Paper No. 8 Filed by: Trial Section Merits Panel Box Interference Washington, D.C. 20231 Tel: 703-308-9797 Fax: 703-305-0942 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ RONALD A. DRAKE and NICKOLAS J. RISTICH, Junior Party, (Application 09/606,498), v. GERARD G. GEIGER, Senior Party, (Patent 5,937,488). _______________ Patent Interference No. 104,569 ______________________ Before LEE, SPIEGEL and MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judges. MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judge. JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO 37 CFR § 1.662 On July 2, 2001, junior party Drake was ordered to show cause why adverse judgment as to the subject matter of the count should not be entered against Drake. (Paper 2). Junior party had until July 18, 2001 to respond to the ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Junior party Drake did not respond.Page: 1 2 3 4 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007