THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 51 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte PHILIP HERVE ____________ Appeal No. 95-0055 Application No. 07/985,354 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before WARREN, WALTZ, and LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judges. WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s refusal to allow claims 45 through 65, as amended after the final rejection (see the amendment dated Dec. 20, 1993 (Paper No. 25), and the Advisory Action dated Feb. 3,Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007