The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 44 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ Ex Parte DAVID S. BAILY, RONALD H. WHITE and JOHN TEXTER _______________ Appeal No. 1995-2781 Application 07/804,868 _______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before, GARRIS, OWENS and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges. JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge. Decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 Applicants appeal a decision of the Primary Examiner rejecting claims 1-16 and 33-51 all the claims in the application. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 134. Background The claimed invention is drawn to aqueous developable photographic elements that are designed to be used in a 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007