Appeal No. 96-0712 Page 13
Application No. 08/015,756
residing at that server.” It is not clear what claim language
appellant relies on for this argument since the claims do not
require a “LAN server.”
We have considered each and every one of appellant’s
arguments but do not find them to overcome the examiner’s prima
facie case of obviousness. Accordingly, we will sustain the
examiner’s rejection of claims 1 through 13 under 35 U.S.C.
103.
The examiner’s decision is affirmed.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007