The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 35
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex Parte MEIXNER HANS-WERNER
_______________
Appeal No. 1996-1945
Application 07/960,421
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before, KIMLIN, KRATZ and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.
JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
Decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
Applicants appeal the decision of the Primary Examiner finally rejecting claims
2, 3, 5-16, 18-24, and 26-34. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 134.1
1 The claims on appeal have been amended by an after final amendment, paper no. 16,
filed February 17, 1995. The Examiner has indicated that the amendment has been entered into
the record. (See Examiner’s Answer, page 1).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007