The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 44
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte STAN W. THOMAS, ROGER D. KEY, KYLE G. FLUEGEL,
WILLIE K. JACKSON, KEITH D. ELWELL
AND GARY L. WHITE
____________
Appeal No. 1996-1955
Application No. 08/392,416
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before PAK, WARREN, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING
Appellants request rehearing of our decision mailed
September 20, 2000, wherein we affirmed the examiner’s
decision rejecting the claims on appeal under the doctrine of
obviousness-type double patenting as unpatentable over claims
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007