Ex Parte INUSHIMA et al - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1996-3262                                                        
          Application No. 08/141,632                                                  


                    wherein at least said second surface is in contact with           
          the fluid in response to a temperature change of said diamond               
          film resulting from heat transfer to sense a parameter of the               
          fluid.                                                                      
               16. An electric device comprising:                                     
                    a film;                                                           
                    means for supplying a heat pulse to said film;                    
                    means for measuring a temperature variation of said               
          film caused by said heat pulse; and                                         
                    means for obtaining an output in response to said heat            
          pulse from said temperature variation.                                      
          The Examiner relies on the following references:                            

          Olmstead                      3,942,378           Mar.  9, 1976             
          Bohrer et al. (Bohrer)        4,478,077           Oct. 23, 1984             
          Miura et al. (Miura)          4,682,496           Jul. 28, 1987             
          Ohta et al. (Ohta)            4,761,995           Aug.  9, 1988             
          Cole                          4,781,065           Nov.  1, 1988             
          Inada et al. (Inada)          5,024,083           Jun. 18, 1991             
          Nakahata et al. (Nakahata)    5,081,434           Jan. 14, 1992             
          Kimoto et al. (Kimoto)        5,144,380           Sep.  1, 1992             
               Claims 1-3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as                    
          anticipated by Kimoto et al.                                                
               Claims 1-3 and 8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as              
          anticipated by Nakahata et al.                                              
               Claims 16 and 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as              
          anticipated by Bohrer et al.                                                
               Claims 5, 6 and 9-15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as           
          being unpatentable over Ohta et al when taken with Nakahata et al           
          and Inada et al.                                                            

                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007