Appeal No. 1997-0547 Application No. 08/020,443 page 7, that Hurle is concerned only with the measurement of the "transfer function" for a conventional Czochralski process, and the Hurle method utilizes perturbations and a study of the results of those perturbations to determine the transfer function. As appellants point out in their brief at page 7, "the fact is that the Hurle reference is not concerned with any automatic control loop and instead is solely concerned with the determination of the transfer function of the process which would later be incorporated into an automatic control system, although the manner and how the transfer function is incorporated into this control system is not specified" (emphasis added). The arguments made by appellants in their brief are buttressed by the statements made in the Hurle declaration. Thus, at paragraph 15.2 of the Hurle declaration, Hurle indicates that a person of ordinary skill in this art "would perceive that the techniques in the paper should not be used to grow crystals but only to determine the transfer function. At paragraph 15.4, Hurle further indicates in his declaration that a person of ordinary skill in the art would understand the perturbations applied by the Hurle publication "were for measuring how the system responded to such perturbation so 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007