Appeal No. 1997-0622
Application No. 08/414,051
column 1, lines 66 through 68; column 3, lines 18 through 20).
Inasmuch as Riordan is silent concerning the transmission of
any type of information to the mobile station, we agree with
the appellants’ argument (brief, page 15) that Riordan lacks
means and a step of sending from the base station to the
mobile station information indicating that the base station is
to be accessed according to one of a plurality of access
methods involving different numbers/types of bursts from the
mobile station to the base station. Appellants argue (brief,
page 16) that:
13
Page: Previous 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007