Ex parte STOUT - Page 4




                     Appeal No. 1997-1878                                                                                                                                              
                     Application 08/372,532                                                                                                                                            


                     because these panels are at each end of the series of panels                                                                                                      
                     1, 6, 7, 24, 25 of which the sleeve is constituted, and are                                                                                                       
                     adhered together to form the sleeve.  We do not consider this                                                                                                     
                     position to be well taken, because in the first place, the                                                                                                        
                     claim requires a sleeve, and the Holley carrier does not                                                                                                          
                     become a sleeve, i.e., a tubular packaging or cover,  until                                                     5                                                 
                     panels 42, 43 are adhered together and the carrier takes the                                                                                                      
                     form shown in Fig. 2.  That being the case, panels 42, 43 are                                                                                                     
                     not end closures for each end of the sleeve, as required by                                                                                                       
                     claim 1, but rather they are part of the side wall of the                                                                                                         
                     sleeve itself.  We find no teaching in Holley, or in either of                                                                                                    
                     Stout or Skillen, which would suggest placing hand-hole                                                                                                           
                     apertures and at least one score line as defined in claim 1 in                                                                                                    
                     the end closure flaps of Holley, as for example, in flaps 3,                                                                                                      
                     55, etc.  Absent any such teaching or suggestion, the                                                                                                             
                     rejections of claims 1, 2, 4, 5 and 8 cannot be sustained.                                                                                                        







                                5 See the definition of “sleeve” in footnote 4, supra.                                                                                                 
                                                                                          4                                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007