The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 25 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte ATSUO WATANABE, KENJIRO NAKAYAMA, and TAKAHISA HIKIDA ____________ Appeal No. 1997-1888 Application No. 08/221,467 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before FRANKFORT, NASE, and LAZARUS, Administrative Patent Judges. LAZARUS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 2-12, 14, 16, 21, 23-25, 39, 40 and 42-52, which are all of the claims pending in this application.1 1 Claims 1, 13, 15, 19, 20, and 22 were canceled via applicants' amendment filed July 29, 1993 (Paper No. 6) and claims 17, 18 and 41 were canceled via applicants' amendment filed June 3, 1994 (Paper No. 11½). Claims 26-38 have been canceled subsequent to the final rejection. See the paper filed November 21, 1995. While the examiner has approved entry of the amendment after final rejection in the margin thereof, we note that this amendment has not been clerically entered.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007