Appeal No. 1997-2066
Application 08/537,408
Claim 3 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Gilhousen and Labedz.
Claim 4 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Gilhousen and Labedz, further in view of
Yamauchi.
Claim 5 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Gilhousen, Labedz, and Yamauchi, further in
view of Gilhousen.
Claims 6 and 7 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over Gilhousen, Labedz, and Yamauchi,
further in view of Harrison.
Claim 9 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Gilhousen, Labedz, Yamauchi, and Harrison,
further in view of the APA.
Claim 10 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over Gilhousen, Labedz, Yamauchi, and
Harrison, further in view of what was well known in the prior
art as exemplified by Gilhousen.
Claim 11 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over Gilhousen, Labedz, Yamauchi, and
Harrison.
- 5 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007