Ex Parte KINET et al - Page 2




                Appeal No. 1997-2122                                                                         
                Application 08/310,902                                                                       


                                          DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 
                      This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of claim 3,           
                the only claim pending in the application.  Claim 3 reads as follows:                        
                      3.  A polypeptide comprising the amino acid sequence corresponding to                  
                the α-subunit of the human FcERI essentially free of the β- and K-subunits of the            
                human FcERI.                                                                                 
                      The references relied upon by the examiner are:                                        
                Kumar et al. (Kumar), “Gel Filtration In 6M Guanidine Hydrochloride of the α-                
                Subunit (And its Fragments) of the Receptor for Immunoglobulin E,”                           
                Molecular Immunology, Vol. 19, No. 12, pp. 1561-567 (1982)                                   
                Kishi, “A New Leukemia Cell Line With Philadelphia Chromosome Characterized                  
                As Basophil Precursors,” Leukemia Research, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 381-90 (1985)                 
                      A reference relied upon by this merits panel is:                                       
                Conrad et al. (Conrad), “The Interaction Of Human And Rodent IgE With The                    
                Human Basophil IgE Receptor,” The Journal of Immunology, Vol. 130, No. 1, pp.                
                327-33 (1983)                                                                                

                      Claim 3 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a).  As evidence of                      
                obviousness, the examiner relies upon Kumar and Kishi.  We reverse and enter                 
                a new ground of rejection under 37 CFR § 1.196(b).                                           






                                                     2                                                       





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007