Appeal No. 1997-2392 Application No. 08/089,990 THE REJECTION UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 103: On this record, the examiner provides two references, Lasky and Gilbert, which teach antibodies specific for epitopes located within the CD4 binding region of HIV-1 gp120. According to the examiner (Answer, page 4) Lasky’s Figure 6 (Lasky, page 979) illustrates that the amino acid sequence of the epitope is variable among different HIV-1 isolates. Lasky’s Figure 6 also illustrates that 1 sequence (HXB2) of the 12 sequences listed comprises the amino acid sequence of appellants’ SEQ ID NO:1. The examiner also finds that Gilbert teach (Answer, bridging sentence, pages 4-5) antiserum raised against a peptide having a sequence that “differs from Seq ID No. 1 of claim 7 by a single residue ([Gilbert’s] Peptide 5 has glutamic acid (E) at position 7 … whereas Seq. ID No: 1 has lysine (K) at this position).” The examiner relies upon Sun’s Figure 6 (Answer, page 5) to establish “that the sequences of the gp120 glycoproteins of various HIV-1 isolates were known in the art at the time the instant invention was made. Figure 6 shows sequences corresponding to the regions containing the CD4 binding sites of fifteen different strains of HIV-1. One of the [15] HIV-1 isolates, designated HXB2, is shown to have a sequence which is identical to that recited in claim 7.” The examiner therefore concludes (Answer, bridging sentence, pages 5-6) that Sun “establishes that an HIV-1 isolate having in its CD4 binding domain a 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007