The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 21 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte YVON BAHOUT and FRANCOIS TAILLIET ____________ Appeal No. 1997-2984 Application No. 08/259,967 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before HAIRSTON, BARRY, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges. BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL The examiner rejected the appellants’ claims 26-28. They appeal therefrom under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a). We reverse. BACKGROUND The invention at issue in this appeal relates to computer buses. A computer bus comprises specialized lines. Some lines convey functional signals such as control, address, data, and clock signals. Two of the other lines supply voltage signals. For example, buses that conform to the I2C standard comprise an "SDA" line for the transmission of control, address, and dataPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007