Ex parte DRESCHER - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1997-2990                                                        
          Application 08/260,318                                                      


          centers of the free interstices (FR) of the other long line                 
          module (M ), and the lengths of the free interstices (FR) in                
                  1                                                                   
          each long line module (M , M ) are selected to be so short that1  2                                                
          for the optoelectronic camera, a radiometrically largely loss-              
          free signal is assured,                                                     
          on the one hand by means of substantially loss-free                         
          signals from the central segment of a linear CCD detector                   
          array behind the completely transparent, or respectively                    
          behind the completely reflective, segment of the beam splitter              
          (ST), and                                                                   
          on the other hand by means of electronic summation of                       
          signals from adjacent linear CCD detector arrays (CCD , CCD ,;1     2                
          CCD , CCD ; CCD , CCD ; ...) in coinciding segments,2    3     3     4                                                       
          corresponding to the transition zones (ÜB , ÜB , ÜB , ÜB , ...),1    2   3    4                    
          between the long line modules (M , M ).1  2                                        
                                                                                     
          The examiner relies on the following references:                            
          Coale                         3,571,489          Mar. 16, 1971              
          Miller et al. (Miller)        5,155,623          Oct. 13, 1992              
          Suganuma et al. (Suganuma)    5,220,626          June 15, 1993              
          Claim 1 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second                       
          paragraph, as failing to particularly point out and distinctly              
          claim the invention.  Claims 1 and 2 stand rejected under 35                
          U.S.C. § 103.  As evidence of obviousness the examiner offers               
          Suganuma in view of Miller and Coale.                                       
          Rather than repeat the arguments of appellant or the                        
          examiner, we make reference to the briefs and the answer for                
          the respective details thereof.                                             
          OPINION                                                                     
                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007