The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 33
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte TED M. DAWSON, JOSEPH P. STEINER
VALINA L. DAWSON, GEORGE R. UHL
and SOLOMON H. SNYDER
__________
Appeal No. 1997-3122
Application No. 08/082,8481
__________
HEARD: November 16, 2000
__________
2
Before WINTERS, ROBINSON and SCHEINER, Administrative Patent Judges.
SCHEINER, Administrative Patent Judge.
1Application for patent filed June 30, 1993.
2Appellants’ oral argument was heard by Administrative Patent Judges Robinson,
Spiegel and Scheiner on November 16, 2000. Subsequently, appellants submitted paper
no. 32, indicating that “the Public Health Service as represented by the Office of
Technology Transfer, having an address at National Institutes of Health . . . is the co-owner
of an undivided interest in the subject application, along with the Johns Hopkins University.”
As the result of this information, Judge Spiegel has recused herself from the case, and
Judge Winters will substitute for her on the panel deciding this appeal.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007