Ex parte SACHDEV - Page 1





                           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not                              
                           written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                              


                                                                                              Paper No. 16                 

                              UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                    
                                                                                                                          

                                    BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                     
                                                AND INTERFERENCES                                                          
                                                                                                                          

                                              Ex parte MANOJ SACHDEV                                                       
                                                                                                                          

                                                  Appeal No. 1997-3163                                                     
                                                 Application 08/498,549                                                    
                                                                                                                          

                                        ORDER REMANDING TO EXAMINER                                                        
                                                                                                                          


                     A Reply Brief was entered on April 28, 1997 (Paper No. 14) in response to the new                     

              ground of rejection in the Examiner’s Answer entered on February 28, 1997 (Paper No. 13).                    

              The Supplemental Examiner’s Answer entered on June 20, 1997 (Paper No. 15) in response to                    

              this Reply Brief failed to address if the new ground of rejection was or was not overcome.                   

                     Accordingly, it is                                                                                    

                            ORDERED that the application is remanded to the examiner for addressing if                     

              the new ground of rejection in the Appeal Brief was or was not overcome by the Reply Brief,                  

              and such further action as may be appropriate.                                                               









Page:  1  2  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007